<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" ><channel><title>The Work Of Neil Martin &#187; copy</title> <atom:link href="http://www.theworkof.co.uk/tag/copy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.theworkof.co.uk</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:49:40 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>Designer charged $18,000 for his own work</title><link>http://www.theworkof.co.uk/2009/04/06/designer-charged-18000-for-his-own-work/</link> <comments>http://www.theworkof.co.uk/2009/04/06/designer-charged-18000-for-his-own-work/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:00:33 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Neil Martin</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category> <category><![CDATA[copy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category> <category><![CDATA[infringement]]></category> <category><![CDATA[jon engle]]></category> <category><![CDATA[relevent studios]]></category> <category><![CDATA[stockart.com]]></category> <category><![CDATA[support]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theworkof.co.uk/?p=303</guid> <description><![CDATA[Jon Engle is a graphic designer from the US who has recently been charged a staggering $18,000 for copyright infringement. The outrageous [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-304" title="copyright" src="http://www.theworkof.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/copyright.jpg" alt="copyright" width="560" height="150" /></p><p>Jon Engle is a graphic designer from the US who has recently been charged a staggering $18,000 for copyright infringement. The outrageous thing is that the work for which he is being charged for is his own work. You can <a href="http://74.125.77.132/search?q=cache:http://www.jonengle.com/2009/04/accused/">read the full story here</a>.</p><p>This post is purely to support Jon in his efforts to get this matter sorted and to discredit the company who are going to every lengths to give him a bad name, stockart.com. The company are actually going to the despicable lengths of calling his clients and telling him he&#8217;s involved in a lawsuit. A lawsuit which he has not brought on himself. I find this completely unprofessional at any level and stockart.com must be discredited for their actions.</p><p>Copyright infringement is a terrible thing. I&#8217;ve had a run in with it myself, where someone has used my logo without my permission. I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;ve ever had the misfortune of being charged $18,000, thankfully. Jon&#8217;s case is a terrible one and one which no designer should have to put up with. I hope he manages to get the case sorted out quickly. stockart.com are going to come out of this very, very badly with the amount of publicity this story is getting.</p><p>Jon&#8217;s blog, situated at <a href="http://www.jonengle.com/">www.jonengle.com</a> is currently down due to the incredible amount of traffic he&#8217;s currently getting so if you wish to voice your support for him, his twitter account can be found at <a href="http://twitter.com/relevantstudio">http://twitter.com/relevantstudio</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.theworkof.co.uk/2009/04/06/designer-charged-18000-for-his-own-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Annoyance, OF grammar;</title><link>http://www.theworkof.co.uk/2008/12/20/the-annoyance-of-grammar/</link> <comments>http://www.theworkof.co.uk/2008/12/20/the-annoyance-of-grammar/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:39:52 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Neil Martin</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category> <category><![CDATA[christmas]]></category> <category><![CDATA[copy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[grammar]]></category> <category><![CDATA[language]]></category> <category><![CDATA[proofread]]></category> <category><![CDATA[spelling]]></category> <category><![CDATA[whsmiths]]></category> <category><![CDATA[writing]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://theworkof.wordpress.com/?p=41</guid> <description><![CDATA[Forgive the title, but it proves a point. Maybe I&#8217;m the wrong person to be writing about grammar, since I don&#8217;t believe [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive the title, but it proves a point.</p><p>Maybe I&#8217;m the wrong person to be writing about grammar, since I don&#8217;t believe mine is perfect, but I do believe that grammar is incredibly important when it comes to design. While many could argue that design is a visual artform, at some point, you&#8217;re going to have to incorporate some copy into it and if that copy is being seen by the public, it&#8217;s important to get it right.</p><div id="attachment_50" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://theworkof.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/img_46582.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-50" title="img_46582" src="http://theworkof.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/img_46582.jpg" alt="Wrong wrong wrong" width="500" height="166" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Wrong wrong wrong</p></div><p>I think one of the worst offenders that I can name off the top of my head are the WHSmith&#8217;s Christmas adverts, which have annoyed me since they were first aired two years ago. Their tagline is:</p><blockquote><p>This Christmas. Think WHSmith&#8217;s.</p></blockquote><p>How is that acceptable grammar? Anyone with even a basic knowledge of grammar knows that that is nowhere near a correct phrase. If anything, it should be:</p><blockquote><p>This Christmas, think WHSmith&#8217;s.</p></blockquote><p>Why have they used a full stop instead of a comma? It makes no sense.</p><p>I&#8217;m sure the majority of people won&#8217;t even notice it at least on a concious level, but I believe that on a subconcious level, most people will. It&#8217;s not going to make them buy less or think of WHSmith&#8217;s as a bad company, but I do believe that it speaks a lot about a company if they can&#8217;t get simple grammar correct. I don&#8217;t believe it speaks much about the design agency that was commissioned to create this advert, either. Little details like this make a big difference.</p><p>Additionally and perhaps sometimes a worse offender is spelling. I think one of the main spelling mistakes people seem to make &#8211; and businesses too &#8211; is &#8220;your&#8221; instead of &#8220;you&#8217;re&#8221;. If you&#8217;re writing your copy in Word, Word doesn&#8217;t know that &#8220;your&#8221; is the incorrect spelling because the word &#8220;your&#8221; is correctly spelt, but it&#8217;s certainly not the right word to use. So many companies don&#8217;t seem to proof their copy so it actually makes sense.</p><p>Another offender would be jargonese. In other words, writing something so that it sounds like you know what you&#8217;re talking about, but in reality, confusing your audience by beating around the bush with superfluous paragraphs. Your customer wants to know what you&#8217;re offering without having to read 5 paragraphs of blurb to get to it.</p><p>Language is such an important design element to consider when you&#8217;re designing anything at all. The copy can sometimes mean the difference between your customer being confused or content.</p><p>So, next time you&#8217;re planning on writing some copy, take another look at it, send it to a few people first. Whatever you do, don&#8217;t rely on your own judgement when it comes to copy because more often than not, because you&#8217;re writing it, it will make sense to you but not others. Proofread it yourself and then get someone else to as well. You&#8217;ll save yourself a headache when your customers are complaining about that full stop instead of a comma.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.theworkof.co.uk/2008/12/20/the-annoyance-of-grammar/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 9/17 queries in 0.041 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.theworkof.co.uk @ 2012-02-12 23:39:11 -->
